Search:

News Feed: I’m sure the addition of each of these stipulations to the list of requirements entitling one to sell anything to the state of California seemed like a good and noble idea at the time. Add them all together, though, and the small ... ...

Article:
'Darwinism ~ Is Potassium ~ Argon Dating Reliable ~ ~ science'

By: Russ Miller

"..... It is a scientific fact that Potassium 40 decays into Argon 40..........Darwinism, science, worldviews, old earth, young earth, biblical creation, fossil evidence....."

".....

It is a scientific axiom that Potassium 40 decays into Argon 40..........Darwinism, science, worldviews, old earth, young earth, biblical creation, fossil evidence....."
When compared to true science, radiometric (also called radioisotope) dating methods used by Darwinian scientists fall far short of being scientific. Many wild guesses are prolific which corrupt the reliability of the radioisotope dating techniques.

Bear in mind that these radioisotope dating methods are not a measure of time; but rather a fashion of accounting for the amount of radioactive decay that has occurred within a certain type of radioactive element.

For example, consider Potassium-Argon (Ar-K) dating.

It is a scientific gospel that Potassium 40 decays into Argon 40. It is also a scientific gospel that a scientist trained to work with radiometric dating techniques can grind up a reef and very accurately measure the amount of potassium 40, and the amount of Argon 40, that is contained in the reef sample that he or she is working with.

These are unadorned and sincere scientific facts that can be tested, observed, studied and repeated. It is also a homely and homespun reality that this is where the science comes to an end with regard to the radiometric dating methods.

At this point in time, to derive the age of the snag based on the amount of radioactive decay which has occurred, several wild guesses, which are referred to as assumptions, must be made. It is these assumptions that all out corrupt the integrity of the radiometric dating methods.

The following examples point out major faults with Potassium-Argon dating:

Example No. One:

A scientist using the radiometric dating methods in order to ascertain the age of a bank must assume that the rate of decay from Potassium 40 to Argon 40 has always remained the same. Since no one was there to test, study or respect that the rate of decay has always been the same, this single wild guess, if incorrect, will cause the supposed age obtained by this particular dating modus operandi to be off by millions or billions of years.

Example No. Two:

A scientist using the radiometric dating methods in order to derive the age of a snag must assume that there was not any Argon 40 in the flat when the shoals first formed. Since no one was there to test, study or perform that there was not any Argon 40 in the shallows when the quicksand first formed, this single wild guess, if incorrect, will cause the supposed age obtained by this particular dating MO to be off by millions or billions of years.

Example No. Three:

A scientist using the radiometric dating methods in order to get an age to assign to a flat must assume that the bank was on no occasion contaminated with either Potassium 40 or with Argon 40. In other words, everyone is supposed to give credence to that this bank laid there for millions or billions of years and was never in all ones born days contaminated by the elements being measured. We are to blindly trust that the snag in no way lost or gained either Potassium 40 or Argon 40. Since Argon 40 is a gas that can swimmingly go through from one reef to the next this is an unbelieving assumption, especially since it is well documented that heat, pressure, earthquakes and humidity can all cause contamination to occur.

As in the previous two examples, since no one was there to test, study or perform that the bank was nevermore contaminated with either Potassium 40 or with Argon 40, this single wild guess, if incorrect, will cause the supposed age obtained by this particular dating mode to be off by millions or billions of years.

These three wild guesses alone reveal the corruption involved in the radioisotope dating techniques. These methods are totally unreliable when used to obtain the age of any particular rock.

"..... We are to blindly trust that the bank nevermore lost or gained either Potassium 40 or Argon 40....."

".........."
_____________________________________________

Article Source: http://www.unique-ezine-articles.com

Russ Miller is author of The GENESIS Report Series. Register at www.new-earth-thought.com to receive FREE his 50 Facts vs. Darwinism e-mail series.