Search:

News Feed: i have been running my own uk horse racing tipster site and my results not blowing my own trumpet have been very successful but i am struggling of where to advertise to. ...

Article:
'Darwinism ~ Is Carbon Dating Reliable ~ ~ science'

By: Russ Miller

".....How can this be?The following discussion of Carbon Dating will demonstrate t..........Darwinism, science, worldviews, old earth, young earth, biblical creation, fossil evidence....."

".....

How can this be?

The following discussion of Carbon Dating will prove the validity of w..........Darwinism, science, worldviews, old earth, young earth, biblical creation, fossil evidence....."
As is the case with radiometric dating methods, Carbon Dating is not a reliable revenue of verifying that the earth is millions or even billions of years old as for a long time claimed by Darwinian scientists.

Both radiometric dating methods and Carbon Dating rely on unfounded assumptions which corrupt the reliability of the dates that these methods obtain. I will get to these unfounded assumptions in a moment.

Looking at abundant strata and fossil evidence observable about planet earth, true science verifies that at that point specific dates are not likely to be valid, Carbon Dating in fact supports a young earth viewpoint, which is that the earth's strata layers can only be a few thousand years old and were laid down during a global flood.

How can this be?

The following discussion of Carbon Dating will evince the validity of what the observable indication indicates.

In Carbon Dating the amount of Carbon-14 in organic remains is measured. Carbon-14 is produced in the earth's atmosphere and during the process of photosynthesis plants take in CO2, which contains trail amounts of Carbon-14. When an animal breathes in air, or eats a plant, it also takes in scar amounts of Carbon-14. Once the plant or animal dies it stops ingesting amounts of Carbon-14. Since Carbon-14 decays away over time, the at the bottom Carbon-14 found in an item the older will be the age assigned to that particular item.

To derive the age of an item based on Carbon Dating, several wild guesses, which are referred to as assumptions, must be made. It is these assumptions that altogether corrupt the integrity of the Carbon Dating method.

For example, a scientist using the Carbon Dating MO in order to ascertain the age of an organic remain must assume that the rate of Carbon-14 decay has always remained the same. Since no one was there to test, study or comply with that the rate of decay has always been the same, this single wild guess, if incorrect, will cause the supposed age obtained by this particular dating way to be quite in error.

Furthermore, scientists seem to agree that measurable Carbon-14 should decay away in at a low ebb than 100,000 years. Therefore, Carbon Dating cannot age an item older than 100,000 years since there would be no Carbon-14 left to measure if the item is de facto that old, or older.

This is of particular interest profaneN Courtesy teachings claim that the Cambrian layer, the lowest stratified shoals substratum with appreciable amounts of fossils in it, is supposed to be up to 580,000,000 years old, which is 5,800 one-hundred-thousand-year periods. Yet scientific studies have revealed that all fossil-bearing layers, down to the supposedly 580-million-year-old Cambrian strata layer, still contain Carbon-14. This by itself proves that the earth's strata, from which all old-earth beliefs have been derived, can only be a few thousand years old!

Of even more interest is that the range of amounts of Carbon-14 found in all the fossil-bearing strata is in the same range from the top layers all the way down to the undermost layers. Since Carbon-14 decays away over time, this proves that all the earth's stratified layers were morphological during a single event. Only a global flood can viably account for this.

".....

This is of particular interest behind the scenes lay teachings claim that the Cambrian layer, the lo....."

".........."
_____________________________________________

Article Source: http://www.unique-ezine-articles.com

Russ Miller is author of The GENESIS Report Series. Register at www.new-earth-thought.com to receive FREE his 50 Facts vs. Darwinism e-mail series.